INTERESTING FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENTS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (Cases P, Q, R, S, T and U) (No 2)


Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions

England and Wales Court of Protection Decisions

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCOP/2017/2...


St Helens Council v M and F (Baby with Multiple Fractures: Rehearing) [2018] EWFC 1 (22 January 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re I (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 898-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT 

Lomax v Lomax (Referral to Early Neutral Evaluation) [2019] EWHC 1267 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Lancashire County Council v TP and Others (Permission to Withdraw Care Proceedings) [2019] EWFC 30-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

OCI and others v Romania (Application no. 49450/17)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

TY v HY [2019] EWHC 1310 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re R (A Child) [2019] EWCA Civ 895-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re T-S (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 742-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Vilinova v Vilinov and Another [2019] EWHC 1107 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT 

Lancashire County Council v TP and Others (Permission to Withdraw Care Proceedings) [2019] EWFC 30-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

A Local Authority v A Mother and Others [2019] EWCA Civ 799-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

CS v SBH & Ors [2019] EWHC 634 (Fam) (18 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

GLADWELL V GLADWELL-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT PRIVATE LAW

Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v M and Another [2019] EWHC 1244 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Uhd v McKay [2019] EWHC 1239 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Lancashire County Council v TP and Others (Permission to Withdraw Care Proceedings) [2019] EWFC 30-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

THUM V THUM FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Baron Land Others (4 Defective Divorces) [2019] EWFC 26-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Vasilyeva v Shemyakin [2019] EWHC 932 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Giusti v Ferragamo [2019] EWCA Civ 691-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re H (Abduction: Retention In Non-Contracting State) [2019] EWCA Civ 672-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re G-L-T (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 717-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re G (Childre.n: Intractable Dispute) [2019] EWCA Civ 548-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re H-L (Summary Dismissal of Care Proceedings) [2019] EWCA Civ 704-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re JN (A Child) [2019] EWHC 850 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Re B (Children: Uncertain Perpetrator) [2019] EWCA Civ 575-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Ipek├ži v McConnell [2019] EWFC 19-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/ipekci-v-mcconnell-201...XW v XH [2019] EWCA Civ 549-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

PR v JES and Another (Appeal: Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding) [2019] EWHC 791 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

VB v JD & Ors [2019] EWHC 612 (Fam) (05 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Downes v Downes & Anor [2019] EWHC 491 (Ch) (13 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

London Borough of Hackney v SJF & Anor [2019] EWCOP 8 (12 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Parent A v Parent B & Ors [2019] EWHC 406 (Fam) (10 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

M v F (Appeal : Fact Finding) [2019] EWHC 572 (Fam) (12 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

SS v CCG & Anor [2018] EWCOP 40 (31 October 2018)-Family Court Judgment

S (No. 2) (Care Proceedings) (Article 15: Second Application for Second Transfer) [2019] EWFC 12 (27 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A and B (Children : Care Order) [2019] EWFC B10 (15 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v FG [2019] EWCOP 7 (29 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

L (special guardianship order), Re [2019] EWFC B7 (28 February 2019-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

L (special guardianship order), Re [2019] EWFC B7 (28 February 2019-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A Lancastrian Council v M [2019] EWFC B6 (07 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

S (A Child : Hague Convention 1980 : Return To Third State) [2019] EWCA Civ 352 (07 March 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

BC v BG [2019] EWFC 7-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Case analysis: Bellino v Judge

ARB v IVF Hammersmith and Another [2018] EWCA Civ 2803-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS

Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

M Jay v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] EWHC 2620 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

X (Wardship : Foreign Proceedings : Child's Evidence) [2019] EWHC 91 (Fam) (22 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

G (Children: Fair Hearing), Re [2019] EWCA Civ 126 (07 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

L v M [2019] EWHC 219 (Fam) (08 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

H (Childen) v (Appeal: Case Management: Part 25 Expert of Treatment) [2019] EWHC 237 (Fam) (21 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

R ( A Child : Appeal : Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam) (29 January 2019-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

LCN v KF & Ors [2019] EWCOP 1 (3 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91 (11 December 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

QC (Appeal: Fact Finder) [2019] EWHC 167 (Fam) (31 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

G-P (A Child) [2019] EWCA Civ 56 (31 January 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 74 (01 February 2019)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A (A Child), Re [2018] EWFC B87 (13 December 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

PRINCE OF LUXEMBOURG FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Supreme Court rejects terminally ill man's challenge over assisted dying

Hertfordshire CC v Ms T and Mr J [2018] EWHC 2796 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Case close-up: IQ v JP-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

NN v AS and Others [2018] EWHC 2973 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

LM v KD [2018] EWHC 3057 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Z v Kent County Council (Revocation of placement order - Failure to assess Mother's capacity and Grandparents) [2018] EWFC B65 (18 October 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re A (A Child) [2018] EWCA Civ 2240-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A (Final Hearing: Threshold not met), Re [2018] EWFC 63 (12 October 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

MB v TB [2018] EWHC 2035 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re H (Children) [2018] EWFC 61-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

UD v XB (Case C-393/18 PPU)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re A (Wardship: 17-year old: S 20 Accommodation) [2018] EWHC 1121 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

CD (A Child : Re Hearing of Fact-Finding) [2018] EWHC 2670 (Fam) (28 September 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Y (Autism -Care Proceedings- Deprivation of Liberty), Re [2018] EWHC B63 (23 April 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

W.X.Y.Z. (Care Proceedings -NAI- EDS -Von Willebrand Disease) [2018] EWFC B62 (19 September 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

H (Children) [2018] EWFC 61 (18 October 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

AP v ALP [2018] EWHC 2758 (Fam) (02 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

C (An Infant), Re [2018] EWHC 2750 (Fam) (17 October 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

IQ v JP C-478/17-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re T (A Child) (Secure Accommodation Order) [2018] EWCA Civ 2136-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

CH v CT [2018] EWHC 1310 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re B-P (Children : Adoption Or Fostering) [2018] EWCA Civ 2042-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

CE v NE (C‑325/18 PPU and C‑375/18 PPU)-FAMILY COURTJUDGMENT

Tattersall v Tattersall [2018] EWCA Civ 1978-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

AW v KJ [2018] EWHC 2229 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E. (Urgent preliminary ruling procedure

R v K [2018] EWFC 59-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




E (Care Orders) [2018] EWFC B52 (05 July 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

London Borough of Lambeth v MCS & Anor [2018] EWCOP 20 (31 August 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

R v K [2018] EWFC 59 (04 September 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v S [2018] EWHC 2323 (Fam) (16 July 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

R-H (Special Guardianship Order) [2018] EWFC B53 (06 September 2018)-FAMILY COURTJUDGMENT

Y and (1) A Healthcare NHS Trust (2) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (3) Z [2018] EWCOP 18-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

W (A Child) [2018] EWHC Civ 1904-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Banfield v Campbell [2018] EWHC 1943 (Ch) (24 July 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS

A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

X (A Child FGMPO) [2018] EWCA Civ 1825-family court judgment

The Child and Family Agency (Ireland) v M & Ors [2018] EWHC 1581-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Akhter v Khan [2018] EWFC 54-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

West Sussex County Council & The Chief Constable of Sussex Police v F M N P and T [2018] EWHC 1702 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

LCC v AB & Ors [2018] EWHC 1960 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

MT v OT [2018] EWHC 868 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re RD (Deprivation of Restriction of Liberty) [2018] EWFC 47-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Northamptonshire County Council & Anor v The Lord Chancellor (via the Legal Aid Agency) [2018] EWHC 1628 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

GM v Carmarthenshire County Council [2018] EWFC 36-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Kelly v Pyres [2018] EWCA Civ 1368-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A v B [2018] EWFC 45-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

P-S (Children) (care orders) [2018] EWCA Civ 1407-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re S (a child) [2018] EWCA Civ 1453-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

XW and XH [2017] EWFC 76-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re M-Y (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 1306-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

KP v LO (Case C-83/17)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re Y (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 1208-FAMILY COURT TRIBUNAL

Re S (Abduction: Hague Convention Or BIIA) [2018] EWCA Civ 1226-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re G (A Child) [2018] EWHC 1301 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re Y (A Child) (s 38(6) Assessment) [2018] EWCA Civ 992-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A Local Authority v M and N (Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order - FGMPO) [2018] EWHC 870 (Fam

Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust v Evans and others [2018] EWHC 953 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Villiers v Villiers [2018] EWCA Civ 112

Re S (A Child) (Article 16 and 18 BIIA and Article 19 EU Service Regulation) [2017] EWHC 3768 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

LKH v TQA AL Z (Interim maintenance and costs funding) [2018] EWHC 1214 (Fam) (19 April 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




Re Z (A Child) [2018] EWFC 25-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

B (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 614-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re C (Children : Fact-Finding) [2018] EWCA Civ 801-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

FJC publishes second edition of its Guidance on Financial Needs on Divorce

Valcheva v Babanarakis (Case C‑335/17)-FAMILY COUTY JUDGMENT

Approach when a local authority seeks permission to withdraw application for care order-family court judgment

Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Evans & Anor v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 805-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re P (A Child) [2018] EWCA Civ 720-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Tlapak and Others v Germany (App nos. 11308/16 and 11344/16)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

T (A Child), Re [2018] EWCA Civ 650-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Wetjen and Others v Germany (App nos. 68125/14 and 72204/14)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re B (Children) (Return of Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 614-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

SR v HR [2018] EWHC 606 (Fam) (23 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

lukenjenko v medway city counciFAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS

A Local Authority v X, Y and Z (Permission to Withdraw) [2017] EWHC 3741 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re T (A Child) (Placement Order)[2018] EWCA Civ 650-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A v R and Another [2018] EWHC 521 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

P v C and others [2018] EWHC 693 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Evans and Another v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust and Another [2018] EWCA Civ 805-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

P v C & Ors [2018] EWHC 693 (Fam) (28 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

SHC NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group v LB & Anor [2018] EWCOP 7 (28 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

W, Re [2018] EWCA Civ 664 (27 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Thompson v Ragget & Ors (Rev 1) [2018] EWHC 688 (Ch) (29 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

AXB x BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB) -FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re SW (No 2) [2017] EWCOP 30-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Mensah v Mensah [2018] EWHC 484 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

RS v LS and LMP [2018] EWHC 449 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re X (A Child - Foreign Surrogacy) [2018] EWFC 15- FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A v R & Anor 2018-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

AB, Re [2016] EWCOP 66 (20 December 2016)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Secretary of State for the Home Department -v- Skripal and Another [2018] EWCOP 6 (22 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS

SR v HR [2018] EWHC 606 (Fam) (23 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

FA v JR [2018] EWHC 381 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re DAM (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 386-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Royer v Hungary (Application no 9114/16)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Habberfield v Habberfield [2018] EWHC 317 (Ch)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






In the cases 16 Children were kept on section 20 Orders for many years, one boy from birth to 9 years of age.
Herefordshire County Council, blatantly disregarding Guidelines and acting illegally.
I am unsure in these cases if the Parents had any contact with their children.?




BABY ALFIE EVANS FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

London Supreme Court In the matter of C (Children) [2018]: a remedy for child abduction by the other parent-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

WS v HS (Appeal: Sale of Matrimonial Home) [2018] EWFC 11-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Kerman v Akhmedova [2018] EWCA Civ 307-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Kirklees Council v LS & Anor [2018] EWFC 12 (20 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

RS v LS & LMP [2018] EWHC 449 (Fam) (07 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

ROYER v. HUNGARY - 9114/16 (Judgment : Respect for family life : Fourth Section) [2018] ECHR 215 (06 March 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A v B [2018] EWHC 328 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

M, Re [2018] EWCOP 4 (08 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

A v A [2018] EWHC 340 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS

Re Y Children Radicalisation 2018-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust v Evans and Anor [2018] EWHC 308 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re M (A Child) [2018] EWCA Civ 240-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Haastrup (No2) (Application for Permission to Appeal and for Stay) [2018] EWHC 147 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re J (Adoption: Appeal) [2018] EWFC 8-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Anderson v Spencer [2018] EWCA Civ 100-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re R (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 198-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re J (Contact Orders: Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re K and D (Wardship Without Notice Return Order) [2017] EWHC 153 (Fam-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

MJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and FD (CSM) (Child support - cancellation) [2018] UKUT 42 (AAC) (5 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

L (A Child) [2018] EWCA Civ 238 (21 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Kent County Council v A, M & Ors (Hair strand testing) [2017] EWFC B104 (01 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

In the matter of C (Children) [2018] UKSC 8 (14 February 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

M (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 245 (19 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

M (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 2356 (13 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

EB v TN & Ors [2017] EWHC 3624 (Fam) (01 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re A-F (Children) (Care Orders: Restrictions on Liberty) [2018] EWHC 138 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

GM v ZM [2018] EWFC 6-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

GM v ZM [2018] EWFC 6-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re W (Fact-Finding) [2014] EWHC 4347 (Fam)

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Haastrup (Withdrawal of Treatment) [2018] EWHC 127 (Fam)

E (A Child) [2017] EWFC 100 (10 July 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

Re Z (A Child) (FGMPO: Prevalence of FGM) [2017] EWHC 3566 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

E (A Child) [2017] EWFC 101 (6 March 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT












Re B-S (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed117048


OLLER KAMINSKA v. POLAND - 28481/12 (Judgment : Right to respect for private and family life) [2018] ECHR 70 (18 January 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




Nedescu v Romania (Application No 70035/10) (European Court of Human Rights, 16 January 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT



T (A Child: Adoption or Special Guardianship), Re [2017] EWCA Civ 1797 (10 November 2017)

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1797.html

FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2018/B1.html


Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





f A Local Authority v G (Parent with Learning Disability) [2017] EWFC B94 -FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT



Re B (A child) (Care Proceedings) 2018-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





Whitlock v Moree [2017] UKPC 44 (21 December 2017)=FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed187430



O’Connell v Lovell (divorce : property) [2017] EWFC B99 (21 December 2017-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT








DMM, Re (Alzheimer's : marriage : power of attorney ) [2017] EWCOP 33 (2 October 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





L (Care and Placement order) [2017] EWFC B98 (18 September 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2017/B98.html


Thum v Thum [2018] EWCA Civ 624-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




Y v Z & Ors [2017] EWFC 83 (21 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT








B v C (temporary leave to remove to non-Hague Convention country) [2017] EWFC B97 (12 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




Sargeant v Sargeant & Anor [2018] EWHC 8 (Ch) (09 January 2018)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT



ES (A Child), Re [2017] EWFC B96 (03 November 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT


ES (A Child), Re [2017] EWFC B96 (03 November 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT


http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2017/B96.html


F v H and another [2017] EWHC 3358 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





T v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and A (CSM) (Child support - variation/departure directions: other) [2017] UKUT 492 (AAC) (8 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




CJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and VW (CSM) (Child support - calculation of income) [2017] UKUT 498 (AAC) (15 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





AO v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and JA (CSM) (Revisions, supersessions and reviews - late applications) [2017] UKUT 499 (AAC) (17 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





A & Ors (Progress by adults with large family over 12 months. Finely balanced departure from experts opinions) [2017] EWFC B95 (17 July 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





T (A Child: Care Order: Beyond Parental Control: Deprivation of Liberty: Authority to Administer Medication) [2017] EWFC B1 (5 January 2018=FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






Akyuz v Akyuz and Another [2017] EWHC 2726 (Fam) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/akyuz-v-akyuz-and-anot...



Lancashire County Council v C (injured baby; adoption) [2017] EWFC B91 FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT








Re HK (Serious Medical Treatment) (No.3) [2017] EWHC 2991 (Fam

https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/re-hk-serious-medical-...


Re LG (Re-opening of Fact-finding) [2017] EWHC 2626 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed182429
Appeal of the decision of a circuit judge not to reopen findings of fact made by magistrates.


L v F [2017] EWCA Civ 2121 (20 December 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




B, Re [2017] EWFC B93 (06 November 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT







Y v Z & Ors [2017] EWFC 60 (04 August 2017)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT



Re W (A Child) [2017] EWCA 2152 (Civ)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed184479


A Local Authority v G (Parent with Learning Disability) [2017] EWFC B94 (18 December 2017-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





M (Children), Re [2017] EWCA Civ 2164--FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




High Court admonishes Guardian, psychiatrist and (to a lesser and interesting extent) Child’s Solicitor






HRH Prince Louis of Luxembourg v HRH Princess Tessy of Luxembourg (Publication of Offer) [2017] EWHC 3095 (Fam)=family court judgment




AB v CD [2017] EWHC 3164 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




S v S [2017] EWHC 3184 (Fam)-FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





MB v Surrey County Council [2017] EWCOP B27 (16 October 2017) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





HC v FW [2017] EWHC 3162 (Fam) (29 November 2017) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






B and C (Change of Names - Parental Responsibility - Evidence) [2017] EWHC 3250 (Fam) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





Strand Lobben and Others v Norway (Application no. 37283/13) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT





R (On the Application Of EL) v Essex County Council [2017] EWHC 1041 (Admin)=FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






Re D (A Child) [2017] EWHC 3075 (Fam) -FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT COMING SOON



Re W (Children), SW (No 2) [2017] EWFC 74 FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT




A Local Authority v M and Others [2017] EWHC 2851 (Fam) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






INTERESTING FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT 2017

Re X (A Child) (Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order) (Restrictions on Travel) [2017] EWHC 2898 (Fam) FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT






Re LG (Re-opening of Fact-finding) [2017] EWHC 2626 (Fam) Appeal of the decision of a circuit judge not to reopen findings of fact made by magistrates.

INTERESTING FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT 2017



London Borough of Brent v D and Ors (Compliance with Guidelines on Judges Meeting Children) [2017] EWHC 2452 (Fam)


Re. X, Y, Z (Morgan v A Local Authority) [2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam)

This is more news with regards to a PAIN case where a Mother was diagnosed to be found suffering from MSBP without ever setting eyes on our Service user.
The Paediatrician was later named after Journalist Brian Morgan took the issue to the High Court for the Paediatrician to be named.



Journalist Brian Morgan took the Case of a Mother who was diagnosed by a Paediatrician with MSBP without ever setting eyes on her within the Family Court arena.
The gagging Order was lifted and the Paediatrician named.
This is the High Court Judgment regarding this Case.

London Borough of Brent v D and Ors (Compliance with Guidelines on Judges Meeting Children) 2017 EWHC 2452 (Fam)

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed181815



X, Y, and Z & Anor v A Local Authority, Court of Appeal - Family Division, May 11, 2011, [2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam)

This is the PAIN case where a Mother was deemed to be suffering from MSBP or FII.
A Paediatrician diagnosed the Mother without ever setting eyes on her, but filed evidence based on here say within the Family Court arena.
Parents involved in these kind of cases are regularly gagged, and are not allowed to mention anything about their case, any shape or form, and if they did could be found guilty of contempt of Court, which could event in a prison sentence.
This case was won, and the Judge ordered Coventry City Council to pay the Parents legal fees.
But what became of the Paediatrician who was not even adequately qualified to diagnose such a condition.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2017/2532.htm


Re A (A Child) (Contact Order: Child’s Contact with Father Where Contact Detrimental to Mother’s Mental Health) [2015] EWCA Civ 910



VERY INTERESTING FAMILY COURT JUDGMENTS


S v S (Relocation) [2017] EWHC 2345 (Fam




  1. Buckinghamshire County Council v Andrew & Ors [2017] EWFC B19 (26 April 2017)             http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2017/B19.html
  2. Re D [2017] EWCA Civ 196         http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed177060
  3. Re AB (fact finding) [2016] EWFC B57 (8 July 2016)    http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed158880 ;
  4. R (fact finding re-opened) [2016] EWFC B14 (18 March 2016)      http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2016/B14.html ;
  5. Re L, K & J [2016] EWFC 12                                                       http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed161764                                                      
  6. LB Hounslow v M and F [2015] EWFC B214 (17 December 2015)   http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2016/B100.html ;
  7. R (Fact Finding), Re [2015] EWFC B95 (15 July 2015)                    http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed145914
  8. Lancashire County Council v P (Injured Child) [2015] EWFC B37                http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2015/409.html
  9. Re F & J [2015] EWFC B231                                                                  http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2015/B231.html
  10. Lancashire v P [2015] EWFC B37                                                    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2015/409.html
  11. Re S [2014] EWCA Civ 1447                                                    http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed136694
  12. Re B (A Child) [2014] EWHC B1 (Fam)                                         http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/B1.html
  13. Re JG [2014] EWHC 479 (Fam)                                                      http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2016/B14.html
  14. Re X & Y (Children disclosure of judgment to police) [2014] EWHC 278 (Fam)  http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed128372  ;
  15. Re A (A Child) [2013] EWHC 3502 (Fam)                           http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed123147 ;
  16. Lancashire County Council v R [2013] EWHC 3064 (Fam)           http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed119291
  17. Re L and M (Children) [2013] EWHC 1569 (Fam)                http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed114560
  18. Re J (children) (care proceedings: past 'possible perpetrators' in new family unit) [2013] All ER (D) 232 (Feb) / [2013] UKSC 9                                                                          http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2013/february/re-j-children-care-procee...
  19. Re M [2012] EWCA Civ 1710                                                        http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed107330
  20. Re M (a child) (oral evidence: vulnerable witness) [2012] All ER (D) 272 (Nov)     https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/family/synopsis/94042:94045/...
  21. Re J (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 38                                            http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed96900
  22. Re JS [2012] EWHC 1370 (Fam)                                               http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed98022











INTERESTING FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT 2017



H (A Child - Hair Strand Testing) [2017] EWFC 64- FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT


COURT OF PROTECTION JUDGEMENT

FAMILY COURT CASE JUDGEMENT

FAMILY SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT

 

SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME/ EVIDENCE: R v Arshad [2012] EWCA Crim 18

CARE PROCEEDINGS/ FRESH EVIDENCE: Re M

K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79

PAIN CASE JUDGMENT NEW MEDICAL EVIDENCE CASE DISMISSED

 

INTERESTING FAMILY PRIVATE LAW JUDGMENT

A v B and C<http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed96467> [2012] EWCA Civ 285
Verdan, A. Hale, C. 2012 Alternative Families and Children: A review of the recent case of A v B and C. Family Law Week.

CHILD FINALLY RETURNED IN RICKETS CASE

FAMILY COURT JUDGMENT-WRAY CASE

A Local Authority v DS [2012] EWHC 1442 (Fam)-President delivers guidance on seeking prior approval by LSC of expert evidence in family proceedings

Court of Appeal decides that CAFCASS is not under a statutory duty to appoint a guardian immediately No breach of Articles 6 or 8 of the ECHR

Supreme Court dismisses mother's appeal in Scottish adoption case

Supreme Court applies the general practice of not awarding costs against authority in care proceedings to fact-finding hearings

Grandparents’ award of costs against the authority is not disturbed by decision.

Re CA (A Baby) [2012] EWHC 2190 (Fam)

Supreme Court to hear care proceedings appeal where authority relied on findings in other proceedings

HAIR STRAND JUDGMENT

Couple can keep Nigerian baby after 'scam' ruling

A Local Authority v S & O [2011] EWHC 3764 (Fam) Fact-finding hearing as to whether a couple who had apparently given birth to a child in Nigeria had been aware that it was actually a ‘staged labour’

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed102837Fact-finding hearing as to whether a couple who had apparently given birth to a child in Nigeria had been aware that it was actually a ‘staged labour’.

J (A Child: Disclosure) [2012] EWCA Civ 1204

Contact proceedings where allegations of abuse by the father had been made to a local authority by a third party who did not want their identity or the details of the allegations to be disclosed.

Re LM (A Child) [2013] EWHC 646 (Fam)

Application, to which all parties consented, for the transfer of care proceedings from the Republic of Ireland to the English courts. The judgment considers the practicalities of achieving the transfer.

M (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1710 (20 December 2012)

Court permits reporting of Bristol foster care case

High Court emphasises the local authority’s duty to consult appropriately before removing children subject to ICO Court finds for mother in judicial review proceedings against council

Court finds for mother in judicial review proceedings against council.

Council ordered to pay legal costs of brothers who spent 13 years in foster care


PAIN CASE WIN UNEXPLAINED FRACTURE CASE JUDGMENT


Mr Justice Baker comments on exceptions to 26 weeks time limit in care cases BASED ON RECENT PAIN CASE WIN JUDGMENT


Legal Aid Agency must pay full costs of parenting assessment in care proceedings

R (on the application of T) v Legal Aid Agency [2013] EWHC 960 (Admin)



Supreme Court to deliver judgment on ‘significant harm’ and proportionality of response

B (A Child) [2012] EWCA Civ 1475

Parents’ appeal of making of a care order in respect of their child in circumstances where the judge had found that the parents posed various risks to the child focussed upon emotional and potential emotional harm.


In the matter of B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33

Supreme Court dismisses parents' appeal against care order

Court considers future psychological harm and threshold criteria.


Supreme Court dismisses parents' appeal against care order PDF JUDGMENT

Court considers future psychological harm and threshold criteria.


Court grants opposed post-adoption contact order


Court of Appeal to consider the test for challenge by parents who have not consented to adoption



High Court revisits ‘real prospect of success’ test when considering appeals


Local authorities’ financial support of foster carers must not discriminate against family and friends

Re B-S (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146


X County Council v Trimega Laboratories and Others [2013] EWCC 6 (Fam)


JUDGMENT WITH REGARDS TO FORCED C SECTION MOTHER AND REMOVAL OF BABY AT BIRTH CASE


Supreme Court allows appeal ordering return of child to USA: KL (A Child) [2013] UKSC 75




Enforced caesarean sanctioned by the Court of Protection


In the Matter of J (Children) [2013] UKSC 9



Child can have separate habitual residence from parent with whom he resides, says Supreme Court


Supreme Court rules that child’s ‘state of mind’ relevant in determining habitual residence



WITHDRAWAL OF CARE PROCEEDINGS: Hertfordshire County Council v H [2013] EWHC 4244 (Fam)

http://www.familylaw.co.uk/articles/withdrawal-of-care-proceedings-..


BRENDAN FLEMING-PAIN CASEC WIN JUDGMENT
























No comments:

Post a Comment

DR SQUIER

THE THINGS THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER OUT OF DURESS BY A SOCIAL WORKER

BY AGREEING TO A SECTION ORDER,YOU WILL BE PLACING YOUR CHILD INTO VOLUNTARY CARE AND FACE LOOSING YOUR BABY TO FORCED ADOPTION

Do not ever agree to sign a section 20 Order out of duress by a Social Worker.

Not only will you be agreeing to Put your Child into voluntary Care, but you will not be entitled to Public Funded Legal Aid at this time.

The Social Worker more than often will say, if you do not agree to sign a section 20 Order, will will go for an Emergency Protection Order.

If they mention an Emergency Protection Order, you will need to act very quickly, and get a Children's Panel Solicitor straight away.

Solicitors that represent PAIN Service Users have been very successful in the past in preventing the granting of an Emergency Protection Order.

Social Workers will not tell you that you can try and discharge the EPO, within 72 hours.

The Local Authority can sit on this order for quite a few weeks,AND AS I HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO PUBLIC FUNDED LEGAL AID AT THIS TIME.

If you receive a Pre Proceedings letter through the post, you must take this letter straight to a specialized Children's Panel Solicitor.

The letter will state that they are considering going for Care Proceedings, and there will be a Pre Proceedings Meeting.

At any Pre Proceedings Meeting they do not always instigate Care Proceedings.

There is sometimes an Agreement contract drawn up, for you as Parents to follow the stipulations written to in the Contract.

If you breach the Agreement, then there is a high expectation that the LA will in most cases instigate Care Proceedings.

When the LA instigate Care Proceedings, and if they go for an Emergency Protection Order, this is when Non Means Tested Public Funded Legal Aid is granted.

With the Governments CHANGE OF DIRECTION FOSTER TILL YOU ADOPT COMING INTO FORCE THREE YEARS AGO, which means Foster Carers are brought in at the early stages of Care Proceedings , or Babies are allocated to Foster Carers before they are even born, this means in a lot of Cases, a Baby will be taken from His or Her Birth Parents within minutes or a few hours after birth, via an Emergency Protection Order.

TO PUT THIS IN THE PROPER TERMS,THE PROSPECTIVE ADOPTERS WILL SEE THE BABY MORE OR LESS WITHIN A FEW HOURS OF BIRTH.

This will also be breaching the Kincare Clause by placing a Child with an immediate Family Member such as Grandparents, Aunties, Uncles, before foster care is explored.

Local Authority's have a mandatory obligation to consider using the Kincare Clause, before a Child is placed into Care, and placed with Foster Carers.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/10/babies-at-risk-of-a....

DO NOT AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER, YOUR LEGAL AID WILL NOT BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME.


How misinterpretation of ‘unwise decisions’ principle illustrates value of legal literacy for social workers

How misinterpretation of ‘unwise decisions’ principle illustrates value of legal literacy for social workers : By Angela Jenkinson and John...

Michael D Innis Shaken Baby Syndrome


I am a pathologist and a hematologist. My qualifications are MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine) University of Madras 1942; DTM&H (Diploma of Tropical Medicine) University of Liverpool; FRCPA (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1960 (Australia); FRCPath (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1972 (United Kingdom). I have substantial experience in hematology and have had experience in interpreting laboratory results for over 30 years. I have been a part time lecturer in Medicine at the University of Queensland and have instructed candidates appearing for Fellowship of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.

[2015 Oct] Shaken Baby Syndrome or Death by Vaccine? Doctor Speaks Out…by Chri...

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis

[pdf] Vaccines, Apparent Life-Threatening Events, Barlow's Disease,...

[pdf] Vitamin K deficiency disease by Michael Innis MBBS

[2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

[March 2008 SBS letter] Child Health Safety - BMJ Stifles Debate

[BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[BMJ 22 March 2002] Misdiagnosis of “Shaken Baby Syndrome” by Michael D Innis

Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Demographics By F. ...

Innis, SM. The role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in the developing brain. Devel Neuroscience, 2000; 22(5-6):4740480.

Quotes
My paper on “Coagulopathy mistaken for Shaken Baby Syndrome” was rejected – it recorded the case of a child given six vaccines on the same day and who was ill with fever, irritability and diarrhoea the next day and was dead three weeks later. Death was certified to be due to the Shaken Baby Syndrome on the evidence of Pathologists, Paediatricians and Radiologists when all the haematological and biochemical evidence clearly indicated death was due to a coagulopathy following hepatic insufficiency and malnutrition. [BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis The truth is it is harming the children because as Wakefield and his colleagues have shown, some ingredient in the vaccine causes methymalonic acidaemia followed by cobalamine deficiency and consequently neurological lesions in genetically susceptible children. The government is blind to this and one way out of this dilemma it seems is for doctors to forgo the five pieces of silver and refuse to vaccinate children on the grounds that the oath they have sworn, "first do no harm" forbids such an action.

In April 2004, Michael D. Innis, the renowned Australian pathologist-hematologist and an expert on SBS, wrote in a communication to the British Medical Journal (BMJ): ". in spite of being repeatedlychallenged to document a single authenticated case of shaken baby syndrome or shaking/impact Injury, no one has been able to do so. All they are required to do to convince judges, juries, and those of us who regard the condition as a spurious diagnosis, is present a case which:
1. was not vaccinated within 21 days of the onset of symptoms;
2. was shown to have a normal coagulation/hemostatic system;
3. had no evidence of malnutrition, and was not artificial fed or premature, since these factors predispose to fractures .
If the numerous pediatricians, ophthalmologists, radiologists and pathologists, who have given evidence in courts in the U.K., U.S. and Australia, are unable to document a single properly investigated case,there is good reason to abandon the diagnosis." Shaken Baby Syndrome And Multiple Vaccinations: An Investigation By Red Flags Columnist, F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP

They will have successfully demolished my explanation if they can document a single case of Shaken Baby Syndrome or “inflicted shaking/impact injury” (as they prefer to call it), which occurred outside the 21-day period and in which a disorder of haemostasis, nutrition, or liver disease was convincingly excluded.
I repeat, the diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome or inflicted shaking/impact injury is a proven figment of the imagination of some in the medical profession and should be relegated to the scrap heap of history before it causes any more shame to the profession and disaster to innocent families. Source

To prevent death following vaccination Alan Clemetson's opinion is; "There are very rare instances of severe reactions or even death following the usual infant inoculations. Although such events are rare, we need to do all we can to prevent them.
Animal observations have shown that the blood histamine concentration is increased following the injection of vaccines or toxoids and this is most likely responsible for the problems.
Vitamin C supplementation is now known to reduce the blood histamine levels; it also reduces the mortality rates following inoculations, both in animals and in man.
It is suggested that inoculations should not be given to severely debilitated infants and that supplementary vitamin C should be given in orange juice, before inoculation, to any infant with coryza, and also to any infant or adult who is to receive an unduly large number of inoculations at one time.
Moreover, vitamin C should be given by injection whenever convulsions or other untoward events occur within a day or two after vaccination or inoculation."[1] Why not try Clemetson's suggestions - out of curiosity? ----Michael D Innis, [2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

ELSIE SCULLY-HICKS FAILINGS

MY CASE

Inspirational women of the year: Alison's son was snatched away after she was wrongly branded a child abuser...now she fights for justice for other mothers
By Laura Topham for The Mail on Sunday
UPDATED: 08:29, 16 April 2009

View comments
The months Alison Stevens spent apart from her son still haunt her.
Twenty four years on, she cannot forget the pain she felt when social services took away her three-year-old without warning - or just cause.
Doctors should have diagnosed brittle bone disease when Alison took Scott to A&E with a broken leg. Instead, they decided he was being abused by his parents and put him in care immediately.
It took 12 long, tormented weeks for Alison and her husband, Andy, an electrician, to clear their names and win their son's return. The joy and relief they felt at having their family reunited was immeasurable. Alison was left so affected by the experience that she was determined to help other people fight similar injustices.
alison stevens
Wrongly accused: Alison Stevens
Since then, she has helped thousands of parents as the head of the national organisation Parents Against Injustice (PAIN).
'I will always remember the hurt and confusion I felt back then,' says Alison. 'It was horrendous finding Scott's hospital bed empty, then being told by nurses they thought we were to blame for his injuries. For months we had to visit him in a foster home when we desperately wanted to have him home.
'I am compelled to help other people because I understand what they are going through and how badly the system can work. This can happen to anyone and, when it does, you feel powerless.
'The toll it takes on you is indescribable - parents call me on the brink of suicide. But through PAIN I am able to help them get their children back.' While the agony still feels fresh to Alison, it was back in 1985 that her son Scott was put in care. He had been having a bath with his brother Lee, then five, when he tried to get out and slipped awkwardly, hurting his leg.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out'
When Alison and Andy took Scott to hospital, doctors insisted he stay in for observation.
'Returning to the hospital that evening to visit Scott, I never suspected anything was amiss,' says Alison.
'But when we reached his bed it was empty.
'A nurse took us into a room and explained that social services had taken him away because his fracture wasn't consistent with an accident. The doctor said that we must have twisted his leg. I was distraught.'
Alison and Andy returned home, scared and confused, not knowing where Scott was and having no idea how they could get him back.
Through Yellow Pages, they discovered PAIN, a national organisation offering advice to parents wrongly accused of child abuse.
'I called them and cried down the phone,' she says.
'They were very comforting, and put me in touch with a solicitor, who specialised in child protection cases, and a doctor for a second opinion.'
The doctor asked whether Scott was small for his size and if his eyes had a blue tinge - both of which were accurate - then explained his symptoms sounded like brittle bone disease. Social services continued to refuse to let the couple know how the case was proceeding.
Then, two days later, police arrested Andy for grievous bodily harm. He was released 12 hours later due to lack of evidence. Yet it was two weeks before the family was finally told where Scott was and allowed to visit him.
An interim order granted them two hours' access, three times each week. 'His foster home was with a one parent family in a scruffy council house. It was a really rough, messy environment,' says Alison.
'When we said goodbye, Scott started screaming. He was asking why we'd sent him away and telling us he hadn't been naughty.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out - I just wanted to take him home.' Alison was put in touch with a brittle bone specialist by PAIN as well as another family whose sons had been taken away in similar circumstances.
Then, three months after Scott had been removed, their solicitor called and said social services had admitted it could have been accidental. The following day, Scott was returned to his parents. 'It was wonderful having Scott back, but he was a changed child,' says Alison.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
'He was constantly angry, used terrible language and wanted everything straightaway.
'He had clearly grown used to having no discipline, and it took three years before he returned to the little boy we had known. And he still thought he'd been naughty, which was heart-breaking.'
But it wasn't only Scott who was left affected - Alison developed the inflammatory disorder Crohn's disease six weeks after Scott was taken, which she puts down to the stress she suffered as a result of losing her little boy. 'The worry was so bad it left me with health problems,' says Alison.
'Since then, I've had depression, a hiatus hernia and inflammatory bowel disease.'
The family waited a year for an appointment with the brittle bone specialist, who swiftly diagnosed the disease.
Yet Alison's experience left her wanting to help other parents, so she set up a support group in Leicester and started working with PAIN, looking after the Midlands and Yorkshire.
In 2002, the Department of Health - which had paid for three full-time paid workers - stopped funding PAIN and the organisation was forced to close.
But Alison was determined to reopen it and took over running it on a voluntary basis, in addition to her full-time work as a hospital nurse. She is now helped by two other people. Alison's achievements have been remarkable.
It was PAIN that pushed for the Parents Allowed in Case Conference Bill in the Nineties. This month, her three-year campaign with John Hemming MP to open up family courts will pay off, as journalists and charity representatives such as herself are finally allowed to attend case conferences, enabling greater public scrutiny of procedures.
She is trying to change the situation for enhanced CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) checks because any allegation remains on a person's file, even if social services take no action - 17,000 people are affected by this. But while Alison is proud of these campaigns, it is her day-to-day work with parents - 'Just being there to listen' - that remains most important to her.
'Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'
'When someone is in that situation, they want to talk to someone who can empathise,' she says.
'Last week, one woman who called was incredibly upset and, after speaking to me, said she had been thinking of suicide.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
Alison takes ten phone calls a day and responds to countless emails and messages asking for advice and guidance.
She regularly attends case conferences and court with parents. Fitting in this huge workload around full-time nursing is difficult.
Even on holiday in Egypt two months ago, Alison found an internet cafe and dealt with inquiries - though she still had 300 emails when she returned home. She feels indebted to the group.
'Without it, I might not have won back my son,' she says.
'Today, Scott is 27 and has his own baby daughter, Holly. Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1170370/Inspirational-women-Alison-wrongly-branded-child-abuser-fights-justice-others.html#ixzz4xDxKBtuk

PAIN DATA PROTECTION LETTER 2

PAIN BRITTLE BONE LEAFLET

PAIN ADVICE LEAFLET

PAIN CASE CONFERENCE NOTES

MY CASE

PAIN MISSION STATEMENT