THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER OUT OF DURESS BY A SOCIAL WORKER

BY AGREEING TO A SECTION ORDER,YOU WILL BE PLACING YOUR CHILD INTO VOLUNTARY CARE AND FACE LOOSING YOUR BABY TO FORCED ADOPTION

Do not ever agree to sign a section 20 Order out of duress by a Social Worker.

Not only will you be agreeing to Put your Child into voluntary Care, but you will not be entitled to Public Funded Legal Aid at this time.

The Social Worker more than often will say, if you do not agree to sign a section 20 Order, will will go for an Emergency Protection Order.

If they mention an Emergency Protection Order, you will need to act very quickly, and get a Children's Panel Solicitor straight away.

Solicitors that represent PAIN Service Users have been very successful in the past in preventing the granting of an Emergency Protection Order.

Social Workers will not tell you that you can try and discharge the EPO, within 72 hours.

The Local Authority can sit on this order for quite a few weeks,AND AS I HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO PUBLIC FUNDED LEGAL AID AT THIS TIME.

If you receive a Pre Proceedings letter through the post, you must take this letter straight to a specialized Children's Panel Solicitor.

The letter will state that they are considering going for Care Proceedings, and there will be a Pre Proceedings Meeting.

At any Pre Proceedings Meeting they do not always instigate Care Proceedings.

There is sometimes an Agreement contract drawn up, for you as Parents to follow the stipulations written to in the Contract.

If you breach the Agreement, then there is a high expectation that the LA will in most cases instigate Care Proceedings.

When the LA instigate Care Proceedings, and if they go for an Emergency Protection Order, this is when Non Means Tested Public Funded Legal Aid is granted.

With the Governments CHANGE OF DIRECTION FOSTER TILL YOU ADOPT COMING INTO FORCE THREE YEARS AGO, which means Foster Carers are brought in at the early stages of Care Proceedings , or Babies are allocated to Foster Carers before they are even born, this means in a lot of Cases, a Baby will be taken from His or Her Birth Parents within minutes or a few hours after birth, via an Emergency Protection Order.

TO PUT THIS IN THE PROPER TERMS,THE PROSPECTIVE ADOPTERS WILL SEE THE BABY MORE OR LESS WITHIN A FEW HOURS OF BIRTH.

This will also be breaching the Kincare Clause by placing a Child with an immediate Family Member such as Grandparents, Aunties, Uncles, before foster care is explored.

Local Authority's have a mandatory obligation to consider using the Kincare Clause, before a Child is placed into Care, and placed with Foster Carers.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/10/babies-at-risk-of-a....

DO NOT AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER, YOUR LEGAL AID WILL NOT BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME.

Michael D Innis Shaken Baby Syndrome

I am a pathologist and a hematologist. My qualifications are MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine) University of Madras 1942; DTM&H (Diploma of Tropical Medicine) University of Liverpool; FRCPA (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1960 (Australia); FRCPath (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1972 (United Kingdom). I have substantial experience in hematology and have had experience in interpreting laboratory results for over 30 years. I have been a part time lecturer in Medicine at the University of Queensland and have instructed candidates appearing for Fellowship of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.

[2015 Oct] Shaken Baby Syndrome or Death by Vaccine? Doctor Speaks Out…by Chri...

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis

[pdf] Vaccines, Apparent Life-Threatening Events, Barlow's Disease,...

[pdf] Vitamin K deficiency disease by Michael Innis MBBS

[2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

[March 2008 SBS letter] Child Health Safety - BMJ Stifles Debate

[BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[BMJ 22 March 2002] Misdiagnosis of “Shaken Baby Syndrome” by Michael D Innis

Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Demographics By F. ...

Innis, SM. The role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in the developing brain. Devel Neuroscience, 2000; 22(5-6):4740480.

Quotes
My paper on “Coagulopathy mistaken for Shaken Baby Syndrome” was rejected – it recorded the case of a child given six vaccines on the same day and who was ill with fever, irritability and diarrhoea the next day and was dead three weeks later. Death was certified to be due to the Shaken Baby Syndrome on the evidence of Pathologists, Paediatricians and Radiologists when all the haematological and biochemical evidence clearly indicated death was due to a coagulopathy following hepatic insufficiency and malnutrition. [BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis The truth is it is harming the children because as Wakefield and his colleagues have shown, some ingredient in the vaccine causes methymalonic acidaemia followed by cobalamine deficiency and consequently neurological lesions in genetically susceptible children. The government is blind to this and one way out of this dilemma it seems is for doctors to forgo the five pieces of silver and refuse to vaccinate children on the grounds that the oath they have sworn, "first do no harm" forbids such an action.

In April 2004, Michael D. Innis, the renowned Australian pathologist-hematologist and an expert on SBS, wrote in a communication to the British Medical Journal (BMJ): ". in spite of being repeatedlychallenged to document a single authenticated case of shaken baby syndrome or shaking/impact Injury, no one has been able to do so. All they are required to do to convince judges, juries, and those of us who regard the condition as a spurious diagnosis, is present a case which:
1. was not vaccinated within 21 days of the onset of symptoms;
2. was shown to have a normal coagulation/hemostatic system;
3. had no evidence of malnutrition, and was not artificial fed or premature, since these factors predispose to fractures .
If the numerous pediatricians, ophthalmologists, radiologists and pathologists, who have given evidence in courts in the U.K., U.S. and Australia, are unable to document a single properly investigated case,there is good reason to abandon the diagnosis." Shaken Baby Syndrome And Multiple Vaccinations: An Investigation By Red Flags Columnist, F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP

They will have successfully demolished my explanation if they can document a single case of Shaken Baby Syndrome or “inflicted shaking/impact injury” (as they prefer to call it), which occurred outside the 21-day period and in which a disorder of haemostasis, nutrition, or liver disease was convincingly excluded.
I repeat, the diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome or inflicted shaking/impact injury is a proven figment of the imagination of some in the medical profession and should be relegated to the scrap heap of history before it causes any more shame to the profession and disaster to innocent families. Source

To prevent death following vaccination Alan Clemetson's opinion is; "There are very rare instances of severe reactions or even death following the usual infant inoculations. Although such events are rare, we need to do all we can to prevent them.
Animal observations have shown that the blood histamine concentration is increased following the injection of vaccines or toxoids and this is most likely responsible for the problems.
Vitamin C supplementation is now known to reduce the blood histamine levels; it also reduces the mortality rates following inoculations, both in animals and in man.
It is suggested that inoculations should not be given to severely debilitated infants and that supplementary vitamin C should be given in orange juice, before inoculation, to any infant with coryza, and also to any infant or adult who is to receive an unduly large number of inoculations at one time.
Moreover, vitamin C should be given by injection whenever convulsions or other untoward events occur within a day or two after vaccination or inoculation."[1] Why not try Clemetson's suggestions - out of curiosity? ----Michael D Innis, [2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

MY CASE

Inspirational women of the year: Alison's son was snatched away after she was wrongly branded a child abuser...now she fights for justice for other mothers
By Laura Topham for The Mail on Sunday
UPDATED: 08:29, 16 April 2009

View comments
The months Alison Stevens spent apart from her son still haunt her.
Twenty four years on, she cannot forget the pain she felt when social services took away her three-year-old without warning - or just cause.
Doctors should have diagnosed brittle bone disease when Alison took Scott to A&E with a broken leg. Instead, they decided he was being abused by his parents and put him in care immediately.
It took 12 long, tormented weeks for Alison and her husband, Andy, an electrician, to clear their names and win their son's return. The joy and relief they felt at having their family reunited was immeasurable. Alison was left so affected by the experience that she was determined to help other people fight similar injustices.
alison stevens
Wrongly accused: Alison Stevens
Since then, she has helped thousands of parents as the head of the national organisation Parents Against Injustice (PAIN).
'I will always remember the hurt and confusion I felt back then,' says Alison. 'It was horrendous finding Scott's hospital bed empty, then being told by nurses they thought we were to blame for his injuries. For months we had to visit him in a foster home when we desperately wanted to have him home.
'I am compelled to help other people because I understand what they are going through and how badly the system can work. This can happen to anyone and, when it does, you feel powerless.
'The toll it takes on you is indescribable - parents call me on the brink of suicide. But through PAIN I am able to help them get their children back.' While the agony still feels fresh to Alison, it was back in 1985 that her son Scott was put in care. He had been having a bath with his brother Lee, then five, when he tried to get out and slipped awkwardly, hurting his leg.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out'
When Alison and Andy took Scott to hospital, doctors insisted he stay in for observation.
'Returning to the hospital that evening to visit Scott, I never suspected anything was amiss,' says Alison.
'But when we reached his bed it was empty.
'A nurse took us into a room and explained that social services had taken him away because his fracture wasn't consistent with an accident. The doctor said that we must have twisted his leg. I was distraught.'
Alison and Andy returned home, scared and confused, not knowing where Scott was and having no idea how they could get him back.
Through Yellow Pages, they discovered PAIN, a national organisation offering advice to parents wrongly accused of child abuse.
'I called them and cried down the phone,' she says.
'They were very comforting, and put me in touch with a solicitor, who specialised in child protection cases, and a doctor for a second opinion.'
The doctor asked whether Scott was small for his size and if his eyes had a blue tinge - both of which were accurate - then explained his symptoms sounded like brittle bone disease. Social services continued to refuse to let the couple know how the case was proceeding.
Then, two days later, police arrested Andy for grievous bodily harm. He was released 12 hours later due to lack of evidence. Yet it was two weeks before the family was finally told where Scott was and allowed to visit him.
An interim order granted them two hours' access, three times each week. 'His foster home was with a one parent family in a scruffy council house. It was a really rough, messy environment,' says Alison.
'When we said goodbye, Scott started screaming. He was asking why we'd sent him away and telling us he hadn't been naughty.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out - I just wanted to take him home.' Alison was put in touch with a brittle bone specialist by PAIN as well as another family whose sons had been taken away in similar circumstances.
Then, three months after Scott had been removed, their solicitor called and said social services had admitted it could have been accidental. The following day, Scott was returned to his parents. 'It was wonderful having Scott back, but he was a changed child,' says Alison.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
'He was constantly angry, used terrible language and wanted everything straightaway.
'He had clearly grown used to having no discipline, and it took three years before he returned to the little boy we had known. And he still thought he'd been naughty, which was heart-breaking.'
But it wasn't only Scott who was left affected - Alison developed the inflammatory disorder Crohn's disease six weeks after Scott was taken, which she puts down to the stress she suffered as a result of losing her little boy. 'The worry was so bad it left me with health problems,' says Alison.
'Since then, I've had depression, a hiatus hernia and inflammatory bowel disease.'
The family waited a year for an appointment with the brittle bone specialist, who swiftly diagnosed the disease.
Yet Alison's experience left her wanting to help other parents, so she set up a support group in Leicester and started working with PAIN, looking after the Midlands and Yorkshire.
In 2002, the Department of Health - which had paid for three full-time paid workers - stopped funding PAIN and the organisation was forced to close.
But Alison was determined to reopen it and took over running it on a voluntary basis, in addition to her full-time work as a hospital nurse. She is now helped by two other people. Alison's achievements have been remarkable.
It was PAIN that pushed for the Parents Allowed in Case Conference Bill in the Nineties. This month, her three-year campaign with John Hemming MP to open up family courts will pay off, as journalists and charity representatives such as herself are finally allowed to attend case conferences, enabling greater public scrutiny of procedures.
She is trying to change the situation for enhanced CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) checks because any allegation remains on a person's file, even if social services take no action - 17,000 people are affected by this. But while Alison is proud of these campaigns, it is her day-to-day work with parents - 'Just being there to listen' - that remains most important to her.
'Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'
'When someone is in that situation, they want to talk to someone who can empathise,' she says.
'Last week, one woman who called was incredibly upset and, after speaking to me, said she had been thinking of suicide.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
Alison takes ten phone calls a day and responds to countless emails and messages asking for advice and guidance.
She regularly attends case conferences and court with parents. Fitting in this huge workload around full-time nursing is difficult.
Even on holiday in Egypt two months ago, Alison found an internet cafe and dealt with inquiries - though she still had 300 emails when she returned home. She feels indebted to the group.
'Without it, I might not have won back my son,' she says.
'Today, Scott is 27 and has his own baby daughter, Holly. Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1170370/Inspirational-women-Alison-wrongly-branded-child-abuser-fights-justice-others.html#ixzz4xDxKBtuk

WELCOME

HOME

Welcome to Parents Against Injustice (PAIN).

We are a voluntary organisation, run and funded by volunteers who are here to provide help and support to families caught in the care system.

We try and assist where possible and make no judgments to your situation.

All contact is totally confidential and kept within the organisation.

Our website has been designed to give pointers on places to go for information and help. Following recent coverage in the media, we also highlight the appalling treatment families are subjected to by Civil Servants. Remember, these are people employed in the public sector and funded by tax payers revenue.

We can be contacted on our contact page from the link to the left of this page.

PAIN cannot be responsible for the content and accuracy of information contained from websites that can be accessed from the links of this site.

MR TYRONE WRIGHT TRAINEE BARRISTER PARENTS AGAINST INJUSTICE DISCLAIMER

PARENTS AGAINST INJUSTICE DISCLAIMER

Mr Tyrone Wright is an excellent Trainee Barrister and has won many cases

for our Service Users.

Tyrone specialises in all Cases regarding issues with Social Services, both Adult and Children's Social Care Cases.

1, Private Law cases,, which include Child contact arrangements.

2, section 47 Child Protection investigations, Both where Parents are divorced, and contact issues, where there may be a change of Residence Order may be being considered.

3, Public Law Care Proceedings.

4, Adult Court of Protection Cases

5, Attending Child Protection Case Conferences, with Parents..

Tyrone Wright is not employed by PARENTS AGAINST INJUSTICE, but works independently.

Private arrangements for payment for Legal Representation by Mr Wright should be negotiated before Tyrone takes your case on.

PARENTS AGAINST INJUSTICE CANNOT ACCEPT ANY RESPONSIBILITY with regards to any money paid to Mr Tyrone Wright, as a part of any Legal Representation.

PAIN is a non profit NGO, and other Advocates, will be accepting traveling costs only with regards to Mackenzie Friend Family Court Representation..

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO EMAIL DIRECTLY IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS.

Kind Regards Alison Stevens Chairperson Parents Against Injustice www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk alison.stevens44@gmail.com

NEW GENERAL GENERAL DATA PROTECTION PRACTICE GUIDELINES MAY 2018

Parents Against Injustice

10 Greensward,

East Goscote,Leicester,

LE73QW,

On May 25th 2018, the new General Data Protection Regulations GPDR will come into force.

This replaces the current Data Protection Act 1998.

This means that your data is kept and stored in a way that is both lawful and compliant with the Data Protection Laws.

WHAT IS PERSONAL DATA?

Personal Data is anything that can identify an individual , such as name , date of birth,phone number , email address, postal address,prison number,and address,

WHAT DOES PAIN HOLD?

PAIN hold information given by those who contact us by phone, email and letter, this includes PAIN Advocates,, who are volunteers.

In this case we only hold email addresses, the brief case histories are deleted within a few days of answering the emails.,

Home Addresses of our Services are not kept on file, the same goes with regards to Service users phone numbers.

Telephone calls are not recorded..

We do not get letters, if we do the letters are shredded after reading.

WHAT IS IT USED FOR?

This information is held in order to respond to those requesting our help and to provide support, information and sign posting and for their ongoing queries .

We also hold it in order to provide anonymous statistics , the first in support of the Parents, Carers, or Individuals who state they have wrongly accused of child abuse.,and persons who state that they have been falsely accused.,

DATA PRIVACY?

PAIN keep information only as long as necessary, in our role of supporting individuals and until our anonymous statistics have been completed on ongoing support roles.

This in our case is only email addresses,

CONSENT?

By requesting PAIN UK,support, you are consenting to our holding your material safely and in accordance with DATA PROTECTION PRACTICES ,for as short a time as necessary in order for any ongoing support, in this case only email addresses.

CONCERNS?

Can be addressed to the Parents Against Injustice Chairperson on 01162602855,or email alison.stevens44@gmail.com.

https://ico.org.uk/concerns

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/what-is-gdpr-uk-eu-legislation-compl...

PAIN Advocates have their own computers. and their is no central Data base.

DISCLAIMER,

Email addresses will be kept on parentsagainstinjustice.ning.com site securely, and have been kept securely for well over 32 years with no breach.

This site only stores email addresses, PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP IF YOU WOULD LIKE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED.

parents-parentsagainstinjustices.com only has PAIN Advocates email addresses.

www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk stores no contact details of services only contact details of 2 PAIN ADVOCATES.

I Will be also updating the PAIN FACEBOOK GROUP DATA PROTECTION DATA IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS.

THE GROUP CONTAINS MEMBERS EMAIL ADDRESSES ONLY.

Kind Regards Alison Stevens Chairperson Parents Against Injustice www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk

parentsagainstinjustice.ning.com. keeps Members email addresses only, properly stored, we have had no security breaches in 32 years of service.

PLEASE CONTACT ME ASAP IF YOU WOULD LIKE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES REMOVED FROM THIS, SITE they will be kept on file until you tell me to delete.

parents-parentsagainstinjustices.com only keeps PAIN Advocates contact emails addresses only.

Kind Regards Alison Stevens Chairperson Parents Against Injustice,www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk ; 24.5.2018

NEW GDPR POLICY

WHAT WE DO WITH YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES KEPT ON FILE ON THIS SITE.

They are stored safely on this site in another secure file on this site.

We do nothing with your secure email address, it is kept on file within this site until you decide to delete your account.

I have highlighted that photos and videos that you have put onto this site are your own copyright. i have no right to delete them because they belong to you.

Please feel free to delete your account , which will also remove your photos and videos.

Kind Regards Alison Stevens Parents Against Injustice Chairperson.www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk

Any problems feel free to PM on this site, or alison.stevens4@hotmail.com

WE CURRENTLY HAVE NOBODY SIGNED UP TO THIS SITE.

AT PRESENT THIS BLOG HAS NO MEMBERS

PHOTOS AND VIDEOS THAT ARE ON THIS SITE NEED TO BE REMOVED BY MEMBERS THEMSELVES TO COMPLY WITH THE NEW DATA PROTECTION GUIDANCE

Photos and videos placed on this site will have to be removed by members themselves, if they do not want their pictures and videos on this site to comply with the new EU Data Protection Guidance starting tomorrow 25th May 2018.

I cannot manually get into your own personal photos or videos on this site.

GO into your own settings to delete.

Any problems please email alison.stevens44@gmail.com. or personally pm me on this site.

Kind Regards Alison Stevens Chairperson, Parents Against Injustice www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk

24.5.2018.

NEW GDPR POLICY

WHAT WE DO WITH YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES KEPT ON FILE ON THIS SITE. They are stored safely on this site in another secure file on this site. We do nothing with your secure email address, it is kept on file within this site until you decide to delete your account. I have highlighted that photos and videos that you have put onto this site are your own copyright. i have no right to delete them because they belong to you. Please feel free to delete your account , which will also remove your photos and videos. Kind Regards Alison Stevens Parents Against Injustice Chairperson.www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk Any problems feel free to PM on this site, or alison.stevens4@hotmail.com we have nobody posting on here at present.

parents against injustice

BREXIT AND FAMILY LAW

Brexit - ongoing Family Law coverage

Part 1: the immediate implications of a no-deal Brexit for cross-border children’s cases

Brexit - ongoing Family Law coverage

No comments:

Post a Comment

DR SQUIER

THE THINGS THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW

MY CASE ON SCRIB

Adoption and Care Planning (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018

Adoption and Care Planning (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER OUT OF DURESS BY A SOCIAL WORKER

BY AGREEING TO A SECTION ORDER,YOU WILL BE PLACING YOUR CHILD INTO VOLUNTARY CARE AND FACE LOOSING YOUR BABY TO FORCED ADOPTION

A Local Authority v A Mother and Others [2019] EWCA Civ 799-FAMILY COURT JUDGEMENT

Michael D Innis Shaken Baby Syndrome

PIP TRIBUNAL MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

PIP TRIBUNAL MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

ELSIE SCULLY-HICKS FAILINGS

ELSIE SCULLY-HICKS FAILINGS

MY CASE

PAIN DATA PROTECTION LETTER 2

PAIN BRITTLE BONE LEAFLET

PAIN ADVICE LEAFLET

PAIN CASE CONFERENCE NOTES

MY CASE

PAIN MISSION STATEMENT

DR WAYNEY SQUIER

PAIN DATA PROTECTION LETTER 1

MY STORY BY A PAIN SERVICE USER

Labels

MY STORY BY A PAIN SERVICE USER

MY CASE

PAIN DATA PROTECTION LETTER 2