Thursday, 5 April 2018

BREAKING: UK hospital agrees to give Alfie Evans another chance

It seems very weird that ACH, are all of a sudden giving Alfie some leeway and that they have decided to keep Alfie on his Ventilator for a longer length of time.
Something is very wrong here?, Alfies Parents have posted YouTube videos on ALFIE ARMY FACEBOOK PAGE, showing videos of the Baby yawning, sucking on a soother, stretching, sneezing, coughing, spitting his soother out when being asked by his Parents.these videos have been seen by many persons, as well as myself.
There was also evidence that the Hospital had given Alfie the wrong dosage of medication on more than 2 different occasions, this documentation was also highlighted on the Facebook page.
So now there are serious issues of the drug errors, as well now, i have already posted the link to the drug error on a past blog.
I went to a local campaign protest the other day, and there was other certain issues that had happened, of which nobody would disclose.
The Family Division of the High Court at the RCJ, had denied the rights of the Parents, and their Application for permission to appeal was denied, as well as their Application to the Supreme Court and the ECHR..
I have also highlighted another case where the child had a very aggressive form of a brain tumour, , the Hospital stated that there was nothing more they could do, 
The Parents in this case skipped the UK to Spain, in their attempt to get proton therapy in Prague.
The Parents were arrested in Spain, and put into prison, but later released and was given the go ahead to take the child for proton therapy in Prague.
The Boy is now back in the UK, and is free of the cancer ,which would of killed him, if the Parents had not taken things into there own hands,  after being told that there was no more that could be done in the UK Hospital.
The Boy is now able to ride his bike and play football..

QUESTIONS ABOUT ALFIE DRUGS AS WELL

ALFIE DEFINITELY RESPONDING HERE

We are being blackmailed into our son's death": Alfie Evans' dad claims hospital won't let him hold toddler

They have challenged the authority of the Hospital and now they are punished for being assertive .
The worst possible nightmare scenario.
If Alfie had of been 18 years or over, he would of definitely been placed on a DOLS, .
And the powers to be have the right to deny a Patients relative from seeing them if they feel it is not in the best interest.
Because Melody  Driscol,   Parents challenged the Hospital regarding her medication, the Hospital referred the issue with Social Services and the Parents had a letter from the LA, stating that she could be placed into care of the Local Authority.

Croydon mum facing court battle to keep seriously ill child

MUM WINS BATTLE TO KEEP TERMINALLY ILL DAUGHTER OUT OF FOSTER CARE

When to end a terminally ill child's life? It's an agonising decision

The DRs and Paediatricians  at  Alderhey Children's In Liverpool have stated that Baby Alfie Evans has no quality of life,
And has stated that it is in Alfie best interest to terminate his life support.and have taken the case to the Family Division of the High Court RCJ.
Judges have ruled in the favour of the Hospital so Alfie is doomed to die.
The Baby's Parents have tried to get permission to appeal, but their wishes were denied.
There only hope now is the ECHR, and the matter is now in the hands of the European Court.
The Parents have stated that Alfie responds to them, and YouTube videos have confirmed this,Alfie is seen opening his eyes, via stimuli , he manages to suck his soother, Alfie Father asks his Son to remove the soother from his mouth, which he then spits it out.
The baby has no diagnosis yet for this brain wasting disease..
There has been an outcry by the General Public, who have emailed the ECHR, asking that Alfie should be given the chance of life, being that the condition has not even been diagnosed and that there is  evidence via YouTube video that Akfie is responding to his Parents, via stimuli , opens his eyes, when being stroked on the cheek,and is seen sucking on his soother.and spitting out his soother when being asked.
Many Children are being nursed and care for at home via a tracheostomy,and connected to a ventilator , with a package of care, i for one has worked as a carer looking after a young adult with muscular dystrophy .
A recent case highlighted how Drs and Paediatricians can be very wrong.  Ashya  King a small Boy with a very aggressive form of a brain tumour  could be very well dead by now, if it had not been for his loving Parents who had heard of a treatment abroad where he could have proton therapy.
The Hospitals stance is that there could be nothing done for the boy, only end of life care.
The Parents SKIPPED TH COUNTRY TO SPAIN, AGAINST HOSPITAL DOCTORS WISHES, HE WAS TAKEN TO A HOSPITAL IN SPAIN, A WARRANT WAS PUT OF FOR THE PARENTS ARREST, they were placed in a prison in Spain.
They were eventually let free , and took their Son to Prague for the treatment, Ashya-  is now living back in the UK, with his parents and siblings, there is no sign of the cancer, he is a healthy little boy that can now play football and ride his bicycle
Another recent case highlights the dilemma of Parents Baby Isaiah Haastrup   was also diagnosed with a brain wasting disease, he was in Kings College Hospital in London, 
The Hospital Trust decided it was in Isaiah best interest for his life support to be terminated, 3 Judges gave permission in the Family Division of the High Court  for the life support to be terminated.
The parents took their case to the Supreme Court, their decision was that they would not overturn the decisions made by the High Court.there only hope was the ECHR, who also denied the Parents attempt for the other Courts decisions  to be overruled.
Baby Isaiah died a few days later, after his ventilator was turned off.the child managed to breath unaided for 7 long hours after life support was terminated.
Could Isaiah survive if he had weaned off the ventilator very slowly,? the poor Parents will never know.
All these case including the Charlie Gard case involved Parents after to sort their legal teams, Probono, as in charlies case.
Parents involved in these tragic cases are denied legal aid, because they are Private Law civil cases.
But yet if the children had been taken into care by a Local Authority, full Public funded legal aid would of been granted.
THE JUDGE IN THE CHARLIE GARD CASE BEWILDERED BY THE LEGAL AID ISSUES REGARDING THESE KINDS OF TRAGIC CASES. 
Secondly, I wish to thank all of the lawyers in this case who have assisted the court
but, in particular, the team who have worked for the parents because they have done it
not for financial reward but have given their services free. It is not for judges to make
political points and I do not now seek to do so. However, it does seem to me that
when Parliament changed the law in relation to legal aid and significantly restricted
the availability of legal aid, yet continued to make legal aid available in care cases
where the state is seeking orders against parents, it cannot have intended that parents
in the position that these parents have been in should have no access to legal advice or
representation.
Mum wins battle to keep terminally ill daughter out of foster care
    

You could have destroyed my whole family' Mum hits out after winning fight to stop terminally ill daughter being taken away

AGAIN THE MELODY DRISCOL CASE HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR LEGAL AID TO BE REINSTATED FOR SUCH TRAGIC CASES

No comments:

Post a Comment

DR SQUIER

THE THINGS THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER OUT OF DURESS BY A SOCIAL WORKER

BY AGREEING TO A SECTION ORDER,YOU WILL BE PLACING YOUR CHILD INTO VOLUNTARY CARE AND FACE LOOSING YOUR BABY TO FORCED ADOPTION

Do not ever agree to sign a section 20 Order out of duress by a Social Worker.

Not only will you be agreeing to Put your Child into voluntary Care, but you will not be entitled to Public Funded Legal Aid at this time.

The Social Worker more than often will say, if you do not agree to sign a section 20 Order, will will go for an Emergency Protection Order.

If they mention an Emergency Protection Order, you will need to act very quickly, and get a Children's Panel Solicitor straight away.

Solicitors that represent PAIN Service Users have been very successful in the past in preventing the granting of an Emergency Protection Order.

Social Workers will not tell you that you can try and discharge the EPO, within 72 hours.

The Local Authority can sit on this order for quite a few weeks,AND AS I HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO PUBLIC FUNDED LEGAL AID AT THIS TIME.

If you receive a Pre Proceedings letter through the post, you must take this letter straight to a specialized Children's Panel Solicitor.

The letter will state that they are considering going for Care Proceedings, and there will be a Pre Proceedings Meeting.

At any Pre Proceedings Meeting they do not always instigate Care Proceedings.

There is sometimes an Agreement contract drawn up, for you as Parents to follow the stipulations written to in the Contract.

If you breach the Agreement, then there is a high expectation that the LA will in most cases instigate Care Proceedings.

When the LA instigate Care Proceedings, and if they go for an Emergency Protection Order, this is when Non Means Tested Public Funded Legal Aid is granted.

With the Governments CHANGE OF DIRECTION FOSTER TILL YOU ADOPT COMING INTO FORCE THREE YEARS AGO, which means Foster Carers are brought in at the early stages of Care Proceedings , or Babies are allocated to Foster Carers before they are even born, this means in a lot of Cases, a Baby will be taken from His or Her Birth Parents within minutes or a few hours after birth, via an Emergency Protection Order.

TO PUT THIS IN THE PROPER TERMS,THE PROSPECTIVE ADOPTERS WILL SEE THE BABY MORE OR LESS WITHIN A FEW HOURS OF BIRTH.

This will also be breaching the Kincare Clause by placing a Child with an immediate Family Member such as Grandparents, Aunties, Uncles, before foster care is explored.

Local Authority's have a mandatory obligation to consider using the Kincare Clause, before a Child is placed into Care, and placed with Foster Carers.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/10/babies-at-risk-of-a....

DO NOT AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER, YOUR LEGAL AID WILL NOT BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME.


Northern Ireland politicians criticise UK government’s abortion proposals

Northern Ireland politicians criticise UK government’s abortion proposals

Michael D Innis Shaken Baby Syndrome


I am a pathologist and a hematologist. My qualifications are MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine) University of Madras 1942; DTM&H (Diploma of Tropical Medicine) University of Liverpool; FRCPA (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1960 (Australia); FRCPath (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1972 (United Kingdom). I have substantial experience in hematology and have had experience in interpreting laboratory results for over 30 years. I have been a part time lecturer in Medicine at the University of Queensland and have instructed candidates appearing for Fellowship of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.

[2015 Oct] Shaken Baby Syndrome or Death by Vaccine? Doctor Speaks Out…by Chri...

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis

[pdf] Vaccines, Apparent Life-Threatening Events, Barlow's Disease,...

[pdf] Vitamin K deficiency disease by Michael Innis MBBS

[2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

[March 2008 SBS letter] Child Health Safety - BMJ Stifles Debate

[BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[BMJ 22 March 2002] Misdiagnosis of “Shaken Baby Syndrome” by Michael D Innis

Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Demographics By F. ...

Innis, SM. The role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in the developing brain. Devel Neuroscience, 2000; 22(5-6):4740480.

Quotes
My paper on “Coagulopathy mistaken for Shaken Baby Syndrome” was rejected – it recorded the case of a child given six vaccines on the same day and who was ill with fever, irritability and diarrhoea the next day and was dead three weeks later. Death was certified to be due to the Shaken Baby Syndrome on the evidence of Pathologists, Paediatricians and Radiologists when all the haematological and biochemical evidence clearly indicated death was due to a coagulopathy following hepatic insufficiency and malnutrition. [BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)

[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis The truth is it is harming the children because as Wakefield and his colleagues have shown, some ingredient in the vaccine causes methymalonic acidaemia followed by cobalamine deficiency and consequently neurological lesions in genetically susceptible children. The government is blind to this and one way out of this dilemma it seems is for doctors to forgo the five pieces of silver and refuse to vaccinate children on the grounds that the oath they have sworn, "first do no harm" forbids such an action.

In April 2004, Michael D. Innis, the renowned Australian pathologist-hematologist and an expert on SBS, wrote in a communication to the British Medical Journal (BMJ): ". in spite of being repeatedlychallenged to document a single authenticated case of shaken baby syndrome or shaking/impact Injury, no one has been able to do so. All they are required to do to convince judges, juries, and those of us who regard the condition as a spurious diagnosis, is present a case which:
1. was not vaccinated within 21 days of the onset of symptoms;
2. was shown to have a normal coagulation/hemostatic system;
3. had no evidence of malnutrition, and was not artificial fed or premature, since these factors predispose to fractures .
If the numerous pediatricians, ophthalmologists, radiologists and pathologists, who have given evidence in courts in the U.K., U.S. and Australia, are unable to document a single properly investigated case,there is good reason to abandon the diagnosis." Shaken Baby Syndrome And Multiple Vaccinations: An Investigation By Red Flags Columnist, F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP

They will have successfully demolished my explanation if they can document a single case of Shaken Baby Syndrome or “inflicted shaking/impact injury” (as they prefer to call it), which occurred outside the 21-day period and in which a disorder of haemostasis, nutrition, or liver disease was convincingly excluded.
I repeat, the diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome or inflicted shaking/impact injury is a proven figment of the imagination of some in the medical profession and should be relegated to the scrap heap of history before it causes any more shame to the profession and disaster to innocent families. Source

To prevent death following vaccination Alan Clemetson's opinion is; "There are very rare instances of severe reactions or even death following the usual infant inoculations. Although such events are rare, we need to do all we can to prevent them.
Animal observations have shown that the blood histamine concentration is increased following the injection of vaccines or toxoids and this is most likely responsible for the problems.
Vitamin C supplementation is now known to reduce the blood histamine levels; it also reduces the mortality rates following inoculations, both in animals and in man.
It is suggested that inoculations should not be given to severely debilitated infants and that supplementary vitamin C should be given in orange juice, before inoculation, to any infant with coryza, and also to any infant or adult who is to receive an unduly large number of inoculations at one time.
Moreover, vitamin C should be given by injection whenever convulsions or other untoward events occur within a day or two after vaccination or inoculation."[1] Why not try Clemetson's suggestions - out of curiosity? ----Michael D Innis, [2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?

ELSIE SCULLY-HICKS FAILINGS

MY CASE

Inspirational women of the year: Alison's son was snatched away after she was wrongly branded a child abuser...now she fights for justice for other mothers
By Laura Topham for The Mail on Sunday
UPDATED: 08:29, 16 April 2009

View comments
The months Alison Stevens spent apart from her son still haunt her.
Twenty four years on, she cannot forget the pain she felt when social services took away her three-year-old without warning - or just cause.
Doctors should have diagnosed brittle bone disease when Alison took Scott to A&E with a broken leg. Instead, they decided he was being abused by his parents and put him in care immediately.
It took 12 long, tormented weeks for Alison and her husband, Andy, an electrician, to clear their names and win their son's return. The joy and relief they felt at having their family reunited was immeasurable. Alison was left so affected by the experience that she was determined to help other people fight similar injustices.
alison stevens
Wrongly accused: Alison Stevens
Since then, she has helped thousands of parents as the head of the national organisation Parents Against Injustice (PAIN).
'I will always remember the hurt and confusion I felt back then,' says Alison. 'It was horrendous finding Scott's hospital bed empty, then being told by nurses they thought we were to blame for his injuries. For months we had to visit him in a foster home when we desperately wanted to have him home.
'I am compelled to help other people because I understand what they are going through and how badly the system can work. This can happen to anyone and, when it does, you feel powerless.
'The toll it takes on you is indescribable - parents call me on the brink of suicide. But through PAIN I am able to help them get their children back.' While the agony still feels fresh to Alison, it was back in 1985 that her son Scott was put in care. He had been having a bath with his brother Lee, then five, when he tried to get out and slipped awkwardly, hurting his leg.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out'
When Alison and Andy took Scott to hospital, doctors insisted he stay in for observation.
'Returning to the hospital that evening to visit Scott, I never suspected anything was amiss,' says Alison.
'But when we reached his bed it was empty.
'A nurse took us into a room and explained that social services had taken him away because his fracture wasn't consistent with an accident. The doctor said that we must have twisted his leg. I was distraught.'
Alison and Andy returned home, scared and confused, not knowing where Scott was and having no idea how they could get him back.
Through Yellow Pages, they discovered PAIN, a national organisation offering advice to parents wrongly accused of child abuse.
'I called them and cried down the phone,' she says.
'They were very comforting, and put me in touch with a solicitor, who specialised in child protection cases, and a doctor for a second opinion.'
The doctor asked whether Scott was small for his size and if his eyes had a blue tinge - both of which were accurate - then explained his symptoms sounded like brittle bone disease. Social services continued to refuse to let the couple know how the case was proceeding.
Then, two days later, police arrested Andy for grievous bodily harm. He was released 12 hours later due to lack of evidence. Yet it was two weeks before the family was finally told where Scott was and allowed to visit him.
An interim order granted them two hours' access, three times each week. 'His foster home was with a one parent family in a scruffy council house. It was a really rough, messy environment,' says Alison.
'When we said goodbye, Scott started screaming. He was asking why we'd sent him away and telling us he hadn't been naughty.
'Leaving him was like having my heart ripped out - I just wanted to take him home.' Alison was put in touch with a brittle bone specialist by PAIN as well as another family whose sons had been taken away in similar circumstances.
Then, three months after Scott had been removed, their solicitor called and said social services had admitted it could have been accidental. The following day, Scott was returned to his parents. 'It was wonderful having Scott back, but he was a changed child,' says Alison.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
'He was constantly angry, used terrible language and wanted everything straightaway.
'He had clearly grown used to having no discipline, and it took three years before he returned to the little boy we had known. And he still thought he'd been naughty, which was heart-breaking.'
But it wasn't only Scott who was left affected - Alison developed the inflammatory disorder Crohn's disease six weeks after Scott was taken, which she puts down to the stress she suffered as a result of losing her little boy. 'The worry was so bad it left me with health problems,' says Alison.
'Since then, I've had depression, a hiatus hernia and inflammatory bowel disease.'
The family waited a year for an appointment with the brittle bone specialist, who swiftly diagnosed the disease.
Yet Alison's experience left her wanting to help other parents, so she set up a support group in Leicester and started working with PAIN, looking after the Midlands and Yorkshire.
In 2002, the Department of Health - which had paid for three full-time paid workers - stopped funding PAIN and the organisation was forced to close.
But Alison was determined to reopen it and took over running it on a voluntary basis, in addition to her full-time work as a hospital nurse. She is now helped by two other people. Alison's achievements have been remarkable.
It was PAIN that pushed for the Parents Allowed in Case Conference Bill in the Nineties. This month, her three-year campaign with John Hemming MP to open up family courts will pay off, as journalists and charity representatives such as herself are finally allowed to attend case conferences, enabling greater public scrutiny of procedures.
She is trying to change the situation for enhanced CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) checks because any allegation remains on a person's file, even if social services take no action - 17,000 people are affected by this. But while Alison is proud of these campaigns, it is her day-to-day work with parents - 'Just being there to listen' - that remains most important to her.
'Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'
'When someone is in that situation, they want to talk to someone who can empathise,' she says.
'Last week, one woman who called was incredibly upset and, after speaking to me, said she had been thinking of suicide.
'In the past month, I've had three families reunited. That's the best news you can ever hear.'
Alison takes ten phone calls a day and responds to countless emails and messages asking for advice and guidance.
She regularly attends case conferences and court with parents. Fitting in this huge workload around full-time nursing is difficult.
Even on holiday in Egypt two months ago, Alison found an internet cafe and dealt with inquiries - though she still had 300 emails when she returned home. She feels indebted to the group.
'Without it, I might not have won back my son,' she says.
'Today, Scott is 27 and has his own baby daughter, Holly. Just looking at my little granddaughter spurs me on.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1170370/Inspirational-women-Alison-wrongly-branded-child-abuser-fights-justice-others.html#ixzz4xDxKBtuk

PAIN DATA PROTECTION LETTER 2

PAIN BRITTLE BONE LEAFLET

PAIN ADVICE LEAFLET

PAIN CASE CONFERENCE NOTES

MY CASE

PAIN MISSION STATEMENT